Sitebook

RPL or do the course?

Both lead to the same qualification. Here is how to tell which one is yours.

Updated 2026-09-22

Two routes lead to the same nationally recognised qualification. Which one is right depends almost entirely on how much of the work you are already doing.

Do the course if…

  • You are new to the trade, or moving into it from something adjacent.
  • You do part of the work but not the range a qualification covers.
  • You cannot evidence what you have done — no records, no photos, nobody to confirm it.
  • You want the training itself, not only the certificate.

Consider RPL if…

  • You have been doing the full scope of the work for years.
  • You can show it: photos, job records, referees, licences.
  • The qualification is a formality standing between you and a licence, a tender, a promotion or a pay grade.

The honest comparison

RPL is usually faster and cheaper than a full course, because you are being assessed rather than taught. But it front-loads effort onto you: gathering evidence takes real time, and it is tedious. People underestimate that and overestimate how much a course would cost them in hours.

RPL can also come back partial. An assessor may recognise most units and require training or further evidence for the rest. That is a normal outcome, not a failure — and it is why nobody can promise you the qualification up front.

Four questions that usually settle it

Most people can answer these in five minutes, and the answers decide the route more reliably than any general advice.

  • Scope. Read the unit list for the qualification. Have you done all of it, or the parts of it your employer happens to need? A qualification covers the trade, not your job description, and the gap between those two is the most common reason RPL comes back partial.
  • Currency. Is the work recent? Assessors commonly look at the last few years. If your best evidence is a decade old, you are arguing that you have kept the skill up, which is a harder argument than showing last year's jobs.
  • Proof. Not "did you do it" but "can you show you did it". If nobody will confirm your work and no records survived, the honest answer is training.
  • Licensing. Does the outcome you actually want — a licence, a card, a registration — require the qualification, or require the qualification and something else? Ask the licensing authority in your state before you spend anything, not after.

What partial recognition actually looks like

People imagine a pass or a fail. The common outcome is neither: an assessor recognises most units and identifies a few where the evidence does not reach. You then close those gaps — sometimes with more evidence, sometimes with targeted training on just those units, which is usually far less than the full course.

That is worth planning for rather than being surprised by. It also means the two routes are not really opposites: a lot of people end up doing RPL for most of a qualification and training for a slice of it.

The costs nobody puts in the comparison

  • The RTO's assessment fee is separate from anything you pay to prepare a portfolio, and it is set by them. Ask for it in writing before you start.
  • Your own hours. Digging out records, chasing referees and photographing work is real time, mostly in evenings. This is the cost people underestimate most.
  • Gap training, if it comes to that. Worth asking an RTO what they charge for it, since a cheap assessment with expensive gap training may cost more overall.

What to ask an RTO before you commit

Whichever route you pick, these are the questions worth asking, and a good provider will answer all of them plainly:

  • What is your total fee, and what does it not include?
  • What evidence do you accept, and what do you refuse?
  • What happens if some units are not recognised, and what does that cost?
  • Is this qualification enough on its own for the licence I am after?
  • Who is the assessor, and what is their background in this trade?

Anyone who answers "you'll definitely get it" to the third question is telling you something useful about themselves.

Where we fit

We help with the evidence-gathering part, for from $349. We do not assess and we are not an RTO; the assessment and the qualification come from a registered training organisation, and their fee is separate. If the comparison above says "do the course", do the course.

If you are still weighing it up, what counts as evidence is the next thing to read — it is the question that decides most of these — and what RPL is covers the process itself. When you know which qualification you are aiming at, the full register list says whether a guide is ready for it.

Start your portfolio

from $349 for six months' access, priced by the size of the qualification. Your RTO's own assessment fee is separate.

Find my qualification